Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bylaws Amendment 2: Single Expenditures"

From HacDC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I think this idea sucks!)
 
(Added Support and Opposition sections, described my own opposition)
Line 1: Line 1:
I think this idea sucks!
+
==Reasons for Opposition==
 +
* I think this idea sucks!
 +
    Objections without reasons or identity are easily discounted. [[User:Ben|Ben]] 17:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
* I'm against this, since adding bureaucracy and extra work for the ministers is not good, particularly when there's no organizational need for it. If there were any substantive abuses of the current processes to cite, then something like this could makes sense. Status quo and less paperwork FTW. [[User:Ben|Ben]] 17:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
==Reason for Support ==

Revision as of 09:49, 7 August 2008

Reasons for Opposition

  • I think this idea sucks!
   Objections without reasons or identity are easily discounted. Ben 17:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm against this, since adding bureaucracy and extra work for the ministers is not good, particularly when there's no organizational need for it. If there were any substantive abuses of the current processes to cite, then something like this could makes sense. Status quo and less paperwork FTW. Ben 17:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Reason for Support